Related Posts & Publications
by Policy Exchange | Sep 29, 2019Related Content Did the Supreme Court get Millerright? The case was certainly one in which the judges developed, as opposed to merely applied, the law. Even the very best lawyer could not have known for sure whether the judges would conclude that the abuse of the...
by Policy Exchange | Sep 29, 2019Related Content North and south of the Border, the courts at first instance dismissed the Miller/Cherry claims in short order as non-justiciable. Miller proceeded directly to the Supreme Court by virtue of the “leapfrog” procedure. Cherry, however, was appealed to the...
by Policy Exchange | Sep 29, 2019Related Content InMiller (No 2),the Supreme Court held that article 9 is intended to protect freedom of speech and debate in the Houses and their committees and the right of the Houses to manage their own affairs without external interference. While prorogation may...
- Crime and Justice
- Demography, Immigration and Integration
- Economics and Social Policy
- Environment and Energy
- Foreign Policy and Security
- Government and Politics
- Health and Social Care
- Housing and Urban Regeneration
- Industrial Strategy
- International Trade
- Security and Extremism
LIVE NOW: ‘2034: A Novel of the Next World War’ by Admiral James Stavridis in conversation with General David Petraeus, Chaired by Air Marshal Edward Stringer - @stavridisj @edwardstrngr twitter.com/i/broadc…
RT @Robert_WH_Ede The Government has a packed reform agenda in health and social care. But is it all achievable, as wider political pressure on waiting times and access builds up? @SeanPhillips91 and I have explored whether something might have to give. twitter.com/ConHome/…