These two primer papers on the UK’s civil and military nuclear history launch the new Policy Exchange Nuclear Enterprise Commission. The Commission’s work will study how the Government should combine and amplify its civil and military nuclear programmes drawing on expertise from renowned international military officials, policymakers, academics, engineers and more. Backed by former UK Cabinet Secretary Rt Hon Simon Case CVO, the Commission’s publications and events will revitalise the conversation which has stalled, re-engaging with nuclear as a source of security and prosperity.

The primer on the UK’s military nuclear history argues that given the weaknesses in Europe’s ability to expand its conventional deterrence, the only answer is enhanced nuclear capability either through independent or joint development programmes. Despite of the cost, Britain has always found a way to prioritise its security through the deterrent and must continue to do so. A strong and independent deterrent is crucial to the European security architecture, particularly at a time of Russian hostility and American uncertainty.

In a foreword to the report, Admiral Lord West of Spithead GCB DSC PC writes:

“The costs of expanding our nuclear deterrent may currently seem insurmountable. But it is worth remembering that the 1940s race to develop a nuclear weapon incurred enormous costs too. We did that then because the alternative was unconscionable: to be exposed to nuclear coercion and attack by our adversaries. If history were to repeat itself, we would have little choice but to make the same decision.”