The Alternative Vote – the system no-one wants

Dec 10, 2010

By Robert McIlveen. Edited by Natalie Evans.

This report tests the Alternative Vote in six key areas: proportionality; safe seats; decisive results; wasted votes; tactical voting and MPs being elected on less than 50% of the vote and finds that in only one (the latter) does it constitute an improvement over First Past the Post.  Indeed, the report finds AV to be worse than FPTP and concludes that it should be rejected.

Related Staff

Robert McIlveen

Research Fellow, 2009-2010 Read Full Bio

Natalie Evans

Deputy Director, 2008-2011 Read Full Bio

Latest Tweets

RT @MrPaulStott My article in The Times on the #Prevent Review, William Shawcross and the challenge posed by Islamist and far-right extremism. The status quo is not an option: thetimes.co.uk/artic…