Related Content

Secretary General of the International Union of Muslim Scholars Attacks New French anti-Separatism Proposals

Apr 21, 2021


Senior figures at the International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS) have continued to condemn the French government for its policies on separatism; which seek to encourage integration and counter-extremism. On his Facebook page, the group’s Secretary-General, Ali Al-Qaradaghi, has posted a call in Arabic opposing an addition to the “anti-separatism” bill that would ban certain religious practices in university corridors. In February, Policy Exchange reported on an IUMS communiqué, in which Al-Qaradaghi called on the French government to stop interfering in Islamic affairs, and on scholars in France and elsewhere to reject racism and religious discrimination against Islam and its followers.

Previously, in April 2019, Al-Qaradaghi was a guest speaker at the East London Mosque (ELM). That event was broadcast live over Facebook at the time.

In his new post, Al-Qaradaghi stated that he did not know the “secret” behind this “irrational rush of inflaming disputes”, but asserted that such measures “encourage mutual extremism”. Adopting the language of universal rights, he claimed that the proposed measures contravene the bill of human rights, arguing that they open the way to oppression of religious rituals. Al-Qaradaghi added that the French Government’s approach undermines the three basic principles upon which France was founded—”freedom, equality, and fraternity”, by “directly violating the citizens’ right to life, spreading hate speech, and restricting freedoms”. In Al-Qaradaghi’s view, this policy is part of what he refers to as a set of racist laws targeting Muslims in France, imposing restrictions on all aspects of their lives.

Al-Qaradaghi asked the people of France to reject “provocative decisions and positions that do not support peaceful life in France …”, and addressed politicians “in the free world” and the French National Assembly (parliament) calling on them “to stand against the addition to the bill, in order to preserve the [three] principles and to preserve the citizens’ rights to freedom of expression and practices”.

Related Content

Latest Tweets

RT @MrPaulStott My article in The Times on the #Prevent Review, William Shawcross and the challenge posed by Islamist and far-right extremism. The status quo is not an option:…