Policy Exchange - International Trade Publications

Choose A Category

June 13, 2026

A Triumph of Hope Over Experience

March 19, 2025

Less than Meets the Eye

December 8, 2022

Brits in High Places

August 8, 2022

Re-engineering Regulation

November 18, 2021

Re-engineering Regulation Project

March 9, 2021

Post-Brexit freedoms and opportunities for the UK

October 30, 2020

A Global Maritime Power

July 15, 2020

The art of a US-UK trade deal

July 24, 2019

Making Global Britain Work

April 1, 2019

Days of Future Past?

March 18, 2019

The Irish Backstop: Nothing has changed? It has actually

March 15, 2019

January 29, 2019

Strengthening the UK’s position on the Backstop

January 28, 2019

The ‘Backstop’ Paralysis: A Way Out

November 28, 2018

A Question of Power

November 1, 2018

The Irish Border and the Principle of Consent

July 23, 2018

Brexit and the British Growth Model

July 9, 2018

Remaking the Case for NATO

July 6, 2018

Brexit: Prospects for Trade and Britain’s Maritime Ports

May 9, 2018

Getting Over the Line: Solutions to the Irish border

March 19, 2018

In Defence of Collective Security

February 5, 2018

Beyond Brexit: Essential reading on international affairs and security in a changing world

December 1, 2017

Undersea Cables: Indispensable, insecure

November 6, 2017

Global Britain, Global Solutions: How British R&D can transform international development

September 22, 2017

Foreign Policy and National Security in the New Parliament

September 4, 2017

UK Strategy in Asia: some starting principles

July 3, 2017

After Brexit: Will Ireland be next to exit?

June 26, 2017

Defying Gravity: A critique of estimates of the economic impact of Brexit

March 28, 2017

The UK and the Western alliance: NATO in the new era of realpolitik

February 3, 2017

After Iraq: When to go to war?

January 26, 2017

The Cost of Doing Nothing: The Price of Inaction in the Face of Mass Atrocities

July 19, 2016

Making Sense of British Foreign Policy After Brexit

May 18, 2016

Drone strikes and international law: what the Joint Committee on Human Rights got wrong