Father and daughter convicted again for running an illegal Islamic school
A headteacher and her father were sentenced on October 11 for running an unregistered Islamic school in Streatham, south London. They were convicted of the same offence two years ago.
Ofsted reported the case on its website as follows:
Nadia Ali was sentenced to 8 weeks imprisonment suspended for 12 months, 120 hours of unpaid work, a 10-day rehabilitation activity requirement, a prohibited activity requirement of not running or managing a school and ordered to pay costs of £500. Her father, Arshad Ali, was fined £300 and ordered to pay costs of £200. Ambassadors Home School Limited was fined £1,000 and ordered to pay costs of £500.
To date, there have been 5 successful prosecutions for running an unregistered school, but today marks the second time a prison sentence has been imposed.
The case dates back to June 2018 when inspectors from Ofsted’s unregistered schools taskforce first visited Ambassadors High School in Streatham, south London. They warned the headteacher, Ms Ali, that they believed the setting was operating illegally.
The following September, Ambassador’s High School applied to register as an independent school, with Nadia Ali’s father, Arshad Ali, named as proprietor. Ofsted carried out a pre-registration inspection in February 2019, which identified serious safeguarding issues and judged that the school, which charged fees of up to £4,500 per pupil, per year, would not meet the independent school standards. However, the school remained open after failing its pre-registration inspection and continued to operate illegally.
According to Ofsted’s report on the pre-registration inspection, which took place in February 2019, the “essential requirements” of personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education – “such as to encourage respect for other people, paying particular regard to the protected characteristics” – were “not provided through the curriculum”.
The report also noted the headteacher’s acknowledgement “that there is no plan or strategy in place to actively promote fundamental British values or to encourage respect for other people, paying particular regard to the protected characteristics”. The report also noted that the school lacked a strategy “for checking that pupils will not encounter the teaching of partisan political views”. It added:
School leaders have not ensured that their statutory duties under the ‘Prevent’ duty are met. The proprietor has not undertaken a local risk assessment, nor do leaders work in partnership with local agencies to share information.
Despite failing the inspection, the school continued to operate.
Ofsted’s press release continued:
In September 2019, Nadia and Arshad Ali were found guilty of running an illegal unregistered school, contrary to section 96 of the Education and Skills Act 2008. Together they were fined £200 and ordered to pay £1,000 in costs and a total of £155 in victim surcharges. Nadia Ali was also sentenced to 120 hours of community service.
However, despite these convictions, when Ofsted inspectors returned to the school 3 more times, between November 2019 and March 2020, they found that it continued to operate.
Inspectors identified several safeguarding failings at the school. It was unclear whether teaching staff had been subject to appropriate employment vetting checks, and those in charge were unable to confirm the identities of all the adults working with children. Inspectors also found fire extinguishers were missing from brackets on walls, and fire evacuation plans displayed in classrooms were incomplete.
Inspectors were informed that children attending the setting were home-educated. However, there was clear evidence that the school was continuing to provide full-time education to at least 5 or more pupils of compulsory school age, meaning it was legally required to register.
Ofsted also published a statement by HM Chief Inspector Amanda Spielman, which read:
It is with breathtaking arrogance that Nadia and Arshad Ali continued to run this illegal school after their convictions 2 years ago. I’m pleased that the judge ruled that a suspended prison sentence was appropriate, given the seriousness of the repeat offending.
Unregistered schools deny children a proper education and put their safety and well-being at risk. I hope today’s sentence sends a clear message to all those running unregistered schools that Ofsted will not tire in our efforts to bring them to justice. But as I have said many times over the last few years, and as this case demonstrates, we urgently need the legislation to be strengthened so that we can take action against these places quickly and conclusively.