Parliament and the Prerogative: From the Case of Proclamations to Miller

Nov 23, 2016

Time & Date

Wednesday 30th November

Registration:      12.45
Start:                  13.15
Sandwich buffet:14.15 – 14.45


Policy Exchange
6th Floor
8-10 Great George Street


Professor Timothy Endicott
Professor of Legal Philosophy in the University of Oxford

Vote of Thanks by the Rt Hon Lord Strathclyde CH

Former Leader of the House of Lords


The Government’s argument in the Miller case is that triggering Article 50 lies within the power of the Crown to make and unmake international treaties – a power the leading litigant, Gina Miller, has termed ‘this ancient, secretive Royal Prerogative’. The legitimacy of the use of the prerogative is questioned by critics, who view its proposed use to trigger Article 50 as an unconstitutional scheme to bypass Parliament. In this lecture, Professor Endicott will argue that there are positive reasons of constitutional principle for an efficient, unified and democratic executive. We can only understand the extent of the executive power, and how it ought to be constrained, if we understand what it is for. Professor Endicott will argue that acting to initiate a withdrawal from the European Union is within the proper constitutional role of the executive. Using the royal prerogative in this way is entirely consistent with the sovereignty of Parliament.


This event will be oversubscribed. To secure your place, please RSVP to


Latest Tweets

RT @MrPaulStott My article in The Times on the #Prevent Review, William Shawcross and the challenge posed by Islamist and far-right extremism. The status quo is not an option:…