Policy Exchange

Nick Barber: Constitutional hardball and justified development of the law

by Policy Exchange | Sep 29, 2019

Related Content Did the Supreme Court get Millerright? The case was certainly one in which the judges developed, as opposed to merely applied, the law. Even the very best lawyer could not have known for sure whether the judges would conclude that the abuse of the...

Jane Smith: The demise of non-justiciability

by Policy Exchange | Sep 29, 2019

Related Content North and south of the Border, the courts at first instance dismissed the Miller/Cherry claims in short order as non-justiciable. Miller proceeded directly to the Supreme Court by virtue of the “leapfrog” procedure. Cherry, however, was appealed to the...

Anne Twomey: Article 9, parliamentary proceedings and the consequences of Miller (No 2)

by Policy Exchange | Sep 29, 2019

Related Content InMiller (No 2),the Supreme Court held that article 9 is intended to protect freedom of speech and debate in the Houses and their committees and the right of the Houses to manage their own affairs without external interference. While prorogation may...

Modernising the United Kingdom

by Policy Exchange | Sep 12, 2019

The 2017 Wolfson Economics Prize

by Policy Exchange | Jul 14, 2017

Policy Exchange

Related Posts & Publications

Nick Barber: Constitutional hardball and justified development of the law

Jane Smith: The demise of non-justiciability

Anne Twomey: Article 9, parliamentary proceedings and the consequences of Miller (No 2)

Modernising the United Kingdom

The 2017 Wolfson Economics Prize

Stay Up To Date

Support Us

Policy Projects

Policy Areas

Latest Tweets